TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Delhi and Madhya Pradesh High Courts clash over legal interpretation prompts Supreme Court intervention</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF CGST DELHI WEST & ORS. Versus GUNJAN BINDAL & ANR.</h3> The SC issued notice on the application for condonation of delay and the Special Leave Petition arising from conflicting interpretations between the Delhi ... Seeking release of amount resumed/seized by respondent no. 2 - power to seize cash under Section 67 of the CGST Act - it was held by High Court that 'The present petition is required to be allowed and the respondents are liable to refund the money seized' - HELD THAT:- In view of the submission that there is a conflict between the interpretation adopted by the Delhi High Court and the Madhya Pradesh High Court, issue notice on the application seeking condonation of delay as well as on the Special Leave Petition. The Supreme Court issued notice on the application seeking condonation of delay and on the Special Leave Petition due to a conflict between interpretations of the Delhi High Court and the Madhya Pradesh High Court.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
