Remuneration to sales organizers allowed as revenue expenditure, temple maintenance and recreation expenses permitted as deductions

ITAT DELHI allowed most appeals filed by the assessee. The tribunal held remuneration to sales organizers as revenue expenditure following precedent. Temple maintenance and staff recreation expenses were allowed as deductions based on coordinate bench decisions. Section 80IA deductions and power charges to Keshav Power Ltd. were permitted. However, advertisement expenditure for debenture warrant conversion was deemed capital expenditure following SC precedent in Broke Bond India Ltd. Section 14A disallowance was rejected due to adequate share capital and reserves. The tribunal directed AO to consider transmission line expenditure claim in AY 2008-09 when liability crystallized. Depreciation on UPS and printers was allowed at 60% following Delhi HC decision.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of remuneration paid to field/sales organizers.
2. Disallowance of temple maintenance and puja expenses.
3. Disallowance of expenditure reimbursed to staff recreation clubs.
4. Disallowance of deduction claimed under section 80IA.
5. Disallowance of power charges paid to M/s KPPL.
6. Disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D.
7. Nature of advertisement expenditure for converting warrants to equity shares.
8. Disallowance of depreciation on UPS and printers.
9. Disallowance of expenditure for laying transmission towers and lines.

Summary:

1. Disallowance of Remuneration Paid to Field/Sales Organizers:
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal regarding the disallowance of remuneration paid to field/sales organizers, following the decision in the assessee's own case for AY 2007-08, where it was held that such remuneration is allowable.

2. Disallowance of Temple Maintenance and Puja Expenses:
The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowance of temple maintenance and puja expenses, consistent with its earlier rulings for AY 2006-07 and AY 2007-08, confirming that these expenses are allowable.

3. Disallowance of Expenditure Reimbursed to Staff Recreation Clubs:
The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowance of expenses reimbursed to staff recreation clubs, following its earlier decisions for AY 2006-07 and AY 2007-08, recognizing these as allowable expenses.

4. Disallowance of Deduction Claimed Under Section 80IA:
The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowance of deduction claimed under section 80IA, following its earlier decisions for AY 2006-07 and AY 2007-08, confirming the assessee's eligibility for the deduction.

5. Disallowance of Power Charges Paid to M/s KPPL:
The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowance of power charges paid to M/s KPPL, following its earlier decisions for AY 2006-07 and AY 2007-08, where it was established that the power charges were validly incurred under a power purchase agreement.

6. Disallowance Under Section 14A Read with Rule 8D:
The Tribunal held that no disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D is warranted if the assessee has sufficient interest-free funds, following the Supreme Court's decision in South Indian Bank Ltd. vs. CIT. It also noted that the AO did not record any dissatisfaction with the assessee's suo moto disallowance, as required by the Supreme Court's decision in Maxopp Investment Ltd. vs. CIT. The issue of disallowance under section 14A while computing book profits under section 115JB was restored to the AO for reconsideration in light of the Special Bench decision in ACIT vs. Vireet Investments Pvt. Ltd.

7. Nature of Advertisement Expenditure for Converting Warrants to Equity Shares:
The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of advertisement expenditure for converting warrants to equity shares, treating it as capital expenditure, following the Supreme Court's decision in CIT vs. Broke Bond India Ltd.

8. Disallowance of Depreciation on UPS and Printers:
The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowance of depreciation on UPS and printers, following the Delhi High Court's decision in CIT vs. BSES Yamuna Powers Ltd., which allowed depreciation at 60%.

9. Disallowance of Expenditure for Laying Transmission Towers and Lines:
The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowance of expenditure for laying transmission towers and lines, treating it as revenue expenditure, following the Delhi High Court's decision in CIT vs. Saw Pipes Ltd. However, it directed the AO to consider the claim of Rs. 43,23,650/- in the AY 2008-09, as the liability was held to have crystallized in that year.

Conclusion:
The appeals of the Revenue for AY 2008-09 to 2010-11 were partly allowed, and the appeals of the assessee for AY 2008-09 to 2010-11 were also partly allowed as indicated. The appeal of the Revenue for AY 2011-12 was dismissed, and the appeal of the assessee for AY 2011-12 was allowed.

---