Additions under Section 68 partially upheld for unexplained share application money lacking proper documentation

ITAT Indore-AT partially allowed the appeal regarding additions under section 68 for unexplained share application money. The tribunal upheld additions for two shareholders - one who allegedly invested after his death date, and another whose meager income of Rs. 47,967 could not support a Rs. 1,30,000 investment. However, additions were deleted for a registered society and club, finding sufficient evidence of identity and creditworthiness. The assessee failed to prove identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of transactions for the upheld additions.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Confirmation of Addition by CIT(A): Whether the CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 13,30,000/- by the AO.
2. Nature of Amount Received: Whether the amount received was in the nature of share application money.
3. Treatment of Lender Companies: Whether the lender companies were rightly treated as paper companies.
4. Compliance with ITAT Directions: Whether the order ignored the direction of the Hon'ble ITAT.

Summary:

1. Confirmation of Addition by CIT(A):
The assessee contested the confirmation of the addition of Rs. 13,30,000/- by CIT(A), which originated from the AO's assessment. The ITAT had previously remanded this issue for fresh examination, but the AO repeated the addition. The Tribunal now had to re-adjudicate the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the shareholders.

2. Nature of Amount Received:
The Tribunal clarified that the impugned amount of Rs. 13,30,000/- was indeed share application money, not an unsecured loan, as previously misunderstood. Both parties agreed on this characterization, and the AO's assessment also acknowledged this nature, stating that the share application money did not appear genuine.

3. Treatment of Lender Companies:
- Shri M.B. Deshmukh: The assessee failed to prove the identity of the shareholder, who allegedly died before signing the share application form. The revised affidavit was unsigned, leading to the conclusion that the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness were not established. The addition of Rs. 5,00,000/- was upheld.
- Shri Vijay Singh Rajput: The assessee provided sufficient evidence, including an affidavit from the shareholder before his death and a PAN card. The addition of Rs. 1,00,000/- was deleted.
- Mayank Welfare Society: The society's investment was linked to accumulated funds, and any violation of section 10(23C) or 11(5) by the society did not justify an addition under section 68 in the assessee's hands. The addition of Rs. 3,00,000/- was deleted.
- Mayank Club: The club's registration and audited receipt & payment account supported the share application money. The AO's conjecture about the club's profile was not based on facts. The addition of Rs. 3,00,000/- was deleted.
- Shri Sanjay Gupta: The shareholder's low annual salary did not support the investment of Rs. 1,30,000/-. The identity was proven, but the creditworthiness and genuineness were not. The addition of Rs. 1,30,000/- was upheld.

4. Compliance with ITAT Directions:
The Tribunal found that the lower authorities did not properly assess the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of certain shareholders, leading to partial relief for the assessee.

Conclusion:
The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal deleting the additions related to Shri Vijay Singh Rajput, Mayank Welfare Society, and Mayank Club, while upholding the additions related to Shri M.B. Deshmukh and Shri Sanjay Gupta. The order was pronounced in the open court on 25.08.2023.

---