Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether parts such as pistons and gaskets of internal combustion engines were assessable to C.V. duty under Tariff Entry 34A or fell under the residuary Entry 68.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the proper classification of the goods under the old tariff structure. The Tribunal had held that the parts in question did not fall within the scope of Entry 34A and that, in the absence of any specific entry, the residuary Entry 68 applied. The Tribunal had also applied the predominant user test in reaching that conclusion.
Conclusion: The classification adopted by the Tribunal was upheld and the Revenue's challenge was rejected.