Marketability and essential character govern classification of railway printed materials, with duty denied when saleability is unproven.

Printed forms, registers, books and similar in-house railway materials are discussed as falling under Chapter 49, not Chapter 48, where printing gives the goods their essential character. The text applies the settled principle that marketability is an essential requirement for excisability and that the burden to prove marketability rests on the Revenue. As the materials were made for internal railway use and were not shown to be capable of being bought and sold in the market, the article states that they were not liable to central excise duty and that the duty, penalty and interest demands were set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether printed forms, registers, books and similar in-house materials produced in a railway printing press were classifiable as products of the printing industry under Chapter 49 or as goods under Chapter 48 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and whether such goods were marketable so as to attract central excise duty.

Analysis: The dispute was covered by earlier Tribunal decisions holding that printed forms and similar articles, where printing imparts the essential character of the product, fall within Chapter 49 as products of the printing industry and not under Chapter 48. The nature of the goods showed that they were printed for internal railway use, contained particulars specific to the railway, and were not shown by the Revenue to be capable of being bought and sold in the market. The settled principle applied was that marketability is an essential ingredient of excisability and the burden to prove it lies on the Revenue.

Conclusion: The printed materials were held classifiable under Chapter 49 and not liable to duty, and the Revenue failed to establish marketability.

Final Conclusion: The duty demands, penalties and interest confirmations were set aside and the appeals were allowed.

Ratio Decidendi: Printed forms and similar articles are excisable only if they are marketable goods; where printing gives the product its essential character and the Revenue fails to prove that the goods are capable of being bought and sold, the goods are classifiable as products of the printing industry and are not dutiable.

---