Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The assessee did not file her original Return of Income for the Assessment Year 2012-13 despite having made a Time deposit of Rs. 11 lakhs. The assessment was reopened by issuing a notice under Section 148 of the Act, but the assessee failed to respond. Subsequent notices under Section 142(1) were also ignored, leading to an ex-parte assessment order and the addition of Rs. 12,90,000/- to the total income of the assessee. The assessee argued that her non-compliance was not intentional or mala fide and that similar issues had been dealt with in earlier assessments. However, the Assessing Officer (AO) did not find the explanations satisfactory, noting that no relevant documents or genuine reasons for non-compliance were provided. The National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) confirmed the penalty, observing that the non-compliance was deliberate and continuous, and that the assessee's failure to file the Return of Income or respond to statutory notices justified the penalty.
Issue 2: Levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.The AO imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- under Section 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with statutory notices. The assessee appealed, arguing that the penalty was unjustified as the non-compliance was due to a bona fide belief and inadvertent mistake. The NFAC dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that the assessee failed to provide any proof or genuine reasons for the non-compliance. The Tribunal upheld the NFAC's decision, noting that the assessee's habitual non-compliance with statutory notices warranted the penalty. The Tribunal found no merit in the assessee's arguments and dismissed the appeal.
Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the assessee's continuous and deliberate non-compliance with statutory notices justified the penalty under Section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed, and the penalty order was confirmed.