Section 271AA penalty not sustained where related-party status was debatable and reasonable cause was shown under Section 273B.

Penalty under Section 271AA was found unsustainable where the assessee's failure to report and maintain documentation for transactions with a foreign supplier arose from a debatable question whether the counterparty was a related party. The Tribunal accepted the assessee's explanation and the surrounding factual matrix, including the earlier finding that the purchase transaction was at arm's length, and the Court endorsed that approach. Section 273B was applied to recognise reasonable cause for the alleged non-compliance, so the penalty could not be imposed on those facts.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalty under Section 271AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was sustainable for alleged failure to report and maintain documentation in relation to the transaction with the foreign supplier, and whether the assessee had established reasonable cause under Section 273B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the transaction partner was a related party requiring disclosure and documentation. The Tribunal accepted the assessee's explanation and the surrounding factual matrix, including the earlier quantum finding that the purchase transaction was at arm's length. The Court found the Tribunal's approach correct and held that the question of related-party status was at least debatable on the facts and materials before the authorities. It further accepted that Section 273B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 protects an assessee from penalty where reasonable cause is shown for the failure attracting penalty under Section 271AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Conclusion: The penalty under Section 271AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was not sustained, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

---