Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment order could be sustained when the Assessing Officer completed the proceedings within a short interval after rejecting the assessee's objections and without affording a meaningful opportunity to challenge the material relied upon, including the tax evasion petition and related statements.
Analysis: The reassessment was founded on material said to have emanated from a tax evasion petition and allied statements. That material was used to make substantial additions, yet it was not properly confronted to the assessee in a manner enabling rebuttal. After the objections to reopening were rejected, the Assessing Officer proceeded to pass the assessment order within about 10 to 12 days, depriving the assessee of a reasonable opportunity to approach the Court and effectively contest the reopening. In reassessment matters, where adverse material is relied upon, the assessee must be given a fair opportunity to meet that material, and the proceedings cannot be rushed so as to render that remedy illusory.
Conclusion: The reassessment order was vitiated by breach of natural justice and could not be sustained; the assessee succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where objections to reopening are rejected, the Assessing Officer must allow a reasonable opportunity before completing reassessment, and any material forming the basis of addition must be fairly confronted to the assessee with a meaningful chance to rebut it.