ITAT upholds section 56(2)(viib) addition rejecting share price rounding off argument citing potential tax losses

The ITAT Indore upheld an addition under section 56(2)(viib) for the difference between issue price and fair market value of shares. The assessee argued for rounding off share prices, but the tribunal rejected this, noting no court precedent supported rounding off in such matters. The revenue cited ITAT decisions prohibiting even one rupee rounding off. The tribunal agreed that allowing rounding off could lead to significant tax losses in larger share issues. Since the assessee had accepted the fair market value at Rs. 19.23 per share in their own valuation certificate, the addition was justified and upheld.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Interpretation of provisions of Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding the issuance of shares and treatment of excess amount received.
2. Consideration of materiality and rounding off in the valuation of shares under Section 56(2)(viib) of the Act.

Summary of Judgment:

Issue 1: The case involved a company that issued equity shares at Rs. 20 per share, while the fair market value was Rs. 19.23 per share. The Assessing Officer (AO) treated the excess amount received as income of the company under Section 56(2)(viib). The company contended that the rounding off of Rs. 0.77 per share was nominal and immaterial, citing practicality and accounting practices. However, the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) upheld the AO's addition, stating that Section 56(2)(viib) does not allow for rounding off. The company appealed to the Appellate Tribunal, arguing for the acceptance of rounding off based on materiality and previous court decisions.

Issue 2: The company's argument before the Tribunal emphasized that the nominal difference in valuation should not lead to adverse tax implications, especially when other sections of the Act recognize materiality and rounding off. The company referred to a Supreme Court decision regarding significant undervaluation in tax matters and urged for a similar approach in their case. The Revenue, however, supported the lower authorities' decisions, emphasizing the clear and unambiguous nature of Section 56(2)(viib) without provisions for rounding off. The Revenue cited ITAT decisions rejecting rounding off claims under similar circumstances.

The Tribunal analyzed the arguments and precedents presented by both sides. It noted that the company failed to provide any court decision supporting rounding off in Section 56(2)(viib) matters. The Tribunal agreed with the Revenue that allowing rounding off could set a precedent leading to potential tax losses in larger share issuances. Since the company had accepted the fair market value in its valuation certificate, the Tribunal upheld the AO's addition as per Section 56(2)(viib). Consequently, the company's appeal was dismissed, and the addition made by the AO was upheld.

---