Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to transfer and utilise tax deducted at source from the pre-GST regime as transitional input tax credit under Section 140 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and whether the show cause notice denying such transfer was sustainable.
Analysis: The petitioner's claim was that amounts deducted and reflected in the pre-GST returns formed part of the credit capable of transition into the GST regime. The Court relied on the earlier view that Section 140, read in the context of the existing law and the transition provisions, entitled assessees to carry forward such credit. It also accepted the reasoning that a purposive construction was required so that the transitional scheme did not defeat credit already embedded in the earlier tax regime. The respondents did not dispute the legal position laid down in the earlier decision.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to transition the TDS credit under Section 140 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and the impugned show cause notice denying such benefit was quashed.