Tribunal Quashes PCIT's Revisionary Order Under Section 263, Supports Assessee's Income Explanation from Medical Profession

The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, a medical practitioner, against the order of the ld. PCIT under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted necessary enquiries and accepted the explanation that the surrendered income during a survey was from the medical profession. The Tribunal determined there was no justification for the revisionary order, as the assessment was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue, thus quashing the order under section 263.

---

---

Issues Involved:
The appeal against the order of the ld. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala pertaining to the 2017-18 assessment year where the invocation of revised jurisdiction by the ld. PCIT under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was challenged by the assessee.

Summary:
The assessee, a Doctor/Medical Practitioner, had a survey action conducted by the Income Tax Department which revealed unaccounted income. The assessee surrendered an amount as additional income during the survey, attributing it to the same business/profession. The Assessing Officer (AO) accepted this explanation, but the ld. PCIT invoked section 263, deeming the assessment order erroneous for not charging the surrendered income at a higher rate under Section 115BBE. The assessee argued that necessary enquiries were made by the AO, and there was no evidence of income from sources other than the medical profession. The AO had issued a Show Cause Notice and the assessee had provided explanations and documents. The ld. PCIT relied on the statement recorded during the survey where the assessee mentioned being unable to explain certain amounts, but the assessee later clarified in writing that the surrendered income was from the medical profession. The Tribunal found that the AO had made adequate enquiries and accepted the explanation, thus quashing the revisionary order under section 263.

This judgment dealt with the issue of invoking revised jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the ld. PCIT based on the surrender of additional income by the assessee during a survey action. The Tribunal observed that the assessee had explained the source of the surrendered income as being from the medical profession, and the AO had conducted necessary enquiries before accepting this explanation. The Tribunal found no justification for deeming the assessment order as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue, ultimately allowing the appeal of the assessee and quashing the revision order passed under section 263.

---