Curable name mismatch in registration documents cannot by itself justify refusal of charitable registration without an opportunity to rectify.

A curable clerical mismatch in the applicant's name across registration documents could not, by itself, justify rejection of registration under section 12AB when the trust deed, PAN, registration particulars and objects were otherwise verifiable. The Tribunal noted that no opportunity had been given to explain or rectify the discrepancy before rejection, so the defect required regularisation rather than final refusal. The matter was therefore restored for fresh consideration with permission to correct the name mismatch and file further supporting material.

---

---

Issues: Whether rejection of an application for registration under section 12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was justified merely because of mismatch in the name appearing in different documents, and whether the matter required restoration for fresh consideration.

Analysis: The application for registration had been supported by the trust deed, registration particulars with the Charity Commissioner, PAN details and accounts. The mismatch in the name appearing in the PAN/Form 10AB and other documents was treated as the principal reason for rejection, but the registration number, PAN and the trust's stated objects were not in dispute. The assessee was not afforded an opportunity to explain or correct the discrepancy before rejection. In these circumstances, the defect appeared curable and could not, by itself, justify final rejection without giving a fair opportunity to the assessee to regularise the records and establish the objects and activities of the trust.

Conclusion: The rejection was not sustained, and the matter was restored to the Commissioner for fresh consideration after permitting correction of the name mismatch and further supporting submissions.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded to the extent of remand, and the registration issue was directed to be reconsidered afresh in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi: A curable clerical mismatch in documents, without prior opportunity to explain or rectify, cannot be the sole basis for rejection of registration when the essential identity and supporting particulars of the applicant are otherwise verifiable.

---