Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether GST was payable on the personal guarantee and security furnished by the Managing Director for the benefit of the company, and whether the impugned orders rejecting exemption were liable to be interfered with.
Analysis: Notification No. 13/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 specifically brings within the reverse charge mechanism services supplied by a director of a company or body corporate to the said company or body corporate. On that basis, the company becomes liable to discharge tax for such services. The notification was not under challenge, and the claim that no GST was payable on the personal guarantee/security arrangement was contrary to the notified tax treatment.
Conclusion: The challenge failed. The Court held that the impugned orders were not erroneous, arbitrary, or illegal, and the petitioner was not entitled to relief.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was dismissed and the orders below were left undisturbed.