Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether central excise duty on single ply yarn was payable at the stage of its manufacture or only after it was doubled or multifolded.
Analysis: Single ply yarn came into existence as an excisable product at the spindle stage. Mere doubling or multifolding of the same yarn did not bring into existence a new commodity. In view of Rule 9(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and Section 49 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, duty attaches when the excisable goods are manufactured, and the liability is not postponed because the goods are later subjected to further processing or captively consumed. The earlier decision on sized yarn and the later decision concerning single yarn both supported the proposition that the first manufactured excisable product bears the levy at the stage of manufacture.
Conclusion: The duty was payable on manufacture of the single ply yarn and not at the later stage of doubling or multifolding, so the demand was valid and the assessee's challenge failed.