Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 5/99-CE dated 28.02.1999 for yarn subjected to winding, doubling and twisting in a single integrated process, and whether denial of Modvat credit could survive if the exemption was available.
Analysis: The yarn received by the appellant was duty-paid single yarn, and the process undertaken in the TFO machine was found to be an integrated operation of twisting, doubling and winding. The governing notification exempted yarn subjected to winding and allied processes where duty had already been paid, and the Tribunal relied on the settled principle that doubling or multi-folding of yarn does not bring into existence a new commodity and does not amount to manufacture. Since the Department had not established that the process fell outside the notification, the exemption could not be denied merely because a separate winding machine was not shown. Once the exemption applied, the dispute regarding Modvat credit on inputs did not independently survive.
Conclusion: The appellant was held entitled to the exemption under Notification No. 5/99-CE, and the restriction of Modvat credit could not be sustained.