Tribunal upholds broker's license suspension for violating CBLR; appeal partly allowed

The Tribunal confirmed the violation of Regulation 10(n) of the CBLR, 2018, as the customs broker failed to verify essential client information and the existence of the exporter. The Tribunal upheld the suspension of the broker's license due to the fraudulent nature of the exports. However, the Tribunal found no evidence of a violation of Regulation 10(e) regarding incorrect information imparted to clients. The appeal was partly allowed, affirming the penalty's proportionality and the violation of Regulation 10(n, resulting in the suspension of the broker's license.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Violation of Regulation 10(e) of CBLR, 2018.
2. Violation of Regulation 10(n) of CBLR, 2018.
3. Proportionality of punishment for the customs broker.

Summary:

Violation of Regulation 10(e) of CBLR, 2018:
The Tribunal examined whether the customs broker (CB) violated Regulation 10(e), which mandates due diligence in ascertaining the correctness of information imparted to clients. The Tribunal found no evidence that the CB imparted incorrect information to the exporter. The original adjudicating authority also did not find any such evidence. Consequently, the Tribunal confirmed the findings of the order under challenge, stating that there was no violation of Regulation 10(e).

Violation of Regulation 10(n) of CBLR, 2018:
Regulation 10(n) requires the CB to verify the correctness of the Importer Exporter Code (IEC), GSTIN, identity of the client, and the client's functioning at the declared address using reliable, independent, authentic documents. The Tribunal noted that the CB failed to visit the exporter's premises and relied on documents received from an agent, Shri Imran Khan, who never appeared before the authorities. The Tribunal found that the CB did not verify the existence of the exporter and failed to produce evidence of the exporter's business operations. The Tribunal upheld the findings of the Meerut Commissionerate, which reported that the exporter was non-existent at the declared address. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that there was a violation of Regulation 10(n).

Proportionality of Punishment:
The Tribunal emphasized the role of the customs broker in ensuring compliance with customs regulations and preventing fraudulent activities. The Tribunal referred to various judgments, including those by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta, highlighting the responsibilities of a customs broker. Given the fraudulent nature of the exports facilitated by the CB, the Tribunal held that the suspension of the CB's license was a proportionate penalty. The Tribunal confirmed the violation of Regulation 10(n) and upheld the suspension of the CB's license.

Conclusion:
The appeal was partly allowed, confirming the violation of Regulation 10(n) and the proportionality of the penalty, while the cross-objections were allowed, leading to the suspension of the CB's license. The Tribunal set aside the finding of no violation of Regulation 10(e).

---