Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was eligible to avail the benefit of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 on the basis that the duty had been quantified on or before 30 June 2019, and whether rejection of the declaration without hearing vitiated the decision.
Analysis: The scheme treated "quantified" as a written communication of the amount of duty payable. For cases under audit, the relevant precondition was that the duty involved had been quantified on or before the cut-off date. The petitioner's letter of 27 May 2019 merely furnished information for audit and did not communicate any duty liability payable. The first real communication of duty demand came later in the show cause notice dated 14 January 2020. Since the petitioner was ineligible at the threshold under Section 125(1), the hearing procedure under Section 127(3) and (4) was not attracted. The absence of a pre-decisional hearing therefore did not assist the petitioner.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not eligible under the scheme because no quantification of duty existed on or before 30 June 2019, and the rejection of the declaration was valid.