Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The petitioners requested to quash Notification No. 26/2017-Customs dated 29.06.2017 and Trade Notice 11/2018 dated 30.06.2017, which required importers to pay IGST. The petitioners argued that these notifications were contrary to the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020, which allowed for the import of capital goods at zero customs duty under the EPCG Scheme.
Issue 2: Refund of IGST paid by the petitioners under the EPCG SchemeThe petitioners sought a refund of the IGST paid, amounting to Rs. 4,95,90,643/-, on the grounds that the levy was illegal and contrary to the policy. The Court referenced a previous decision in the case of M/s. Prince Spintex Pvt Ltd vs. Union of India, where it was held that the levy of IGST on imports under the EPCG Scheme during the period from 01.07.2017 to 13.10.2017 was not in consonance with the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020.
Issue 3: Validity of the levy of IGST on imports under the EPCG Scheme during the transition to the GST regimeIt was argued that the imposition of IGST on imports under the EPCG Scheme was due to an oversight when amending Notification No. 16/2015-Cus. The Court found that the intention of the Central Government was always to exempt such imports from additional duties, including IGST. The Court held that Notification No. 79/2017 dated 13.10.2017, which exempted IGST on such imports, should be considered clarificatory and applicable retrospectively from 01.07.2017.
Final Directions:The Court quashed Trade Notice 11/2018 and the impugned order-in-original dated 29.09.2018. It held that the petitioners are entitled to a refund of the IGST paid during the period from 01.07.2017 to 13.10.2017, with interest at the statutory rate. The petitions were allowed, and the rule was made absolute in each petition.