DVO valuation additions under section 69 fail where assessee's evidence is ignored and cross-examination is denied.

Additions under section 69 based solely on the DVO's estimate of construction cost were held unsustainable where the assessee's valuation material was not properly considered. The assessee had relied on a government-approved valuer's report and notified construction rates, but the Assessing Officer gave no persuasive reasons for rejecting that evidence. The DVO's basis was also not effectively tested, as the assessee was not given a meaningful opportunity to cross-examine the DVO. Reliance on the valuation report alone, without addressing these objections or testing the methodology, was found inconsistent with fair procedure and natural justice, and the additions were deleted.

---

---

Issues: Whether the additions made under section 69 on the basis of the District Valuation Officer's estimate of construction cost could be sustained when the assessee's valuation evidence was not effectively considered and the DVO was not made available for cross-examination.

Analysis: The additions arose from a search-based reference for determination of year-wise investment in construction of a residential property. The assessee had placed reliance on a government-approved valuer's report and on the minimum construction rates notified by the Government of NCT of Delhi. The record showed that the Assessing Officer did not assign persuasive reasons for rejecting the assessee's valuation evidence and did not confront the assessee with an effective opportunity to test the DVO's basis, including by cross-examination. In these circumstances, reliance on the DVO report alone, without meeting the assessee's objections and without testing the valuation methodology, was held to be inconsistent with fair procedure and natural justice.

Conclusion: The additions based on the DVO's valuation were not sustainable and were deleted.

---