Non-profit wins appeal against revenue on development charges disallowance. Compliance with directives justified expenses.

The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision in favor of the non-profit organization, dismissing the revenue's appeal regarding the disallowance of development charges by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found the organization had complied with government directives by setting aside the charges for future use, justifying the expenses under the development fund. The appeals of the revenue and cross objections of the assessee for the relevant assessment years (A.Ys. 2014-15, 2016-17 to 2018-19) were consequently dismissed.

---

---

Issues involved:
The issues involved in the judgment are related to the disallowance of development charges by the Assessing Officer (AO) and subsequent appeals filed by the revenue against the orders of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) for the Assessment Years (A. Ys.) 2014-15, 2016-17 to 2018-19.

Issue 1: Disallowance of development charges by the Assessing Officer

The assessee, a statutory authority, collected development charges during the relevant assessment year and set aside 85% of the amount under the head development fund for future use. The Assessing Officer disallowed the expenses claimed under the head development fund as the assessee had not incurred any expenditure towards development activities. The total income of the assessee was assessed at a higher amount than the returned loss.

Issue 2: Appeal before the CIT(A) and Tribunal

The assessee appealed before the CIT(A) who, after considering the facts of the case, reply uploaded by the assessee, and previous ITAT orders, allowed the appeal of the assessee. Subsequently, the revenue preferred appeals before the Tribunal challenging the order of the CIT(A) on the grounds that the disallowance of development charges should not have been deleted.

Tribunal's Decision:

The Tribunal, after hearing both parties and examining the material on record, upheld the order of the CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal of the revenue. The Tribunal noted that the assessee, being a non-profit organization, was bound by the directions of the Government and had debited 85% of the development charges to the sinking fund for future formation charges as per government directions. The Tribunal relied on a previous order for the A.Y. 2009-10 to 2013-14 in the assessee's own case, where a similar issue was addressed, and allowed the appeal of the assessee.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal held that the disallowance of development charges made by the AO was not justified as the assessee, being a non-profit organization, was following government directives in debiting the charges to the sinking fund for future use. The Tribunal's decision was based on the nature of the organization and the requirements set by the government for the utilization of the development charges. As a result, the appeals of the revenue and the cross objections of the assessee for the relevant assessment years were dismissed.

---