Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to regular bail after filing of the charge-sheet in view of the period of custody, absence of special circumstances, parity with co-accused, and willingness to cooperate.
Analysis: The applicant had been in custody since 14.02.2023 and the investigation was complete with the charge-sheet filed, though charge had not yet been framed. No notice had been issued by the GST authority, and co-accused had already been granted regular bail. The Court also noted that the prosecution could not point out any special circumstances against the applicant. Relying on the principles governing bail, the Court found that the matter did not require detailed examination of evidence at that stage and that the discretion to grant bail could be exercised.
Conclusion: The applicant was held entitled to regular bail.