Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made on account of cash deposits and the related assessment required reconsideration in view of the alleged lack of verification and denial of proper opportunity.
Analysis: The dispute centred on cash deposits in the assessee's bank account claimed to represent sale proceeds of agricultural land. The assessment and appellate orders had sustained the addition, but the material before the Tribunal showed that the issue had not been examined with adequate verification from the revenue side. In these circumstances, and with the consent of both sides, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal directed that the assessee be afforded a reasonable opportunity of hearing in the set-aside proceedings.
Conclusion: The addition was not finally sustained at this stage and the issue was sent back to the Assessing Officer for de novo consideration after giving the assessee a proper opportunity.