Confiscation for import without licence sustained, with redemption fine and penalty left unchanged under settled precedent.

Confiscation of old and used clothing imported without the required licence was treated as justified, and the Tribunal declined to interfere with the quantum fixed by the adjudicating authority. Finding no infirmity in the impugned order and following its earlier precedent, the Tribunal held that the existing redemption fine and penalty were sufficient. No enhancement was warranted because the adjudicating authority's assessment was consistent with the governing view on such unauthorised imports.

---

---

Issues: Whether the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the importer required enhancement or whether the adjudicating authority's quantum was to be sustained.

Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier view that, in the facts of imports of old and used clothing without the required licence, confiscation was justified. On the question of quantum, it noted that the adjudicating authority had already imposed redemption fine and penalty and that the present appeal sought enhancement. In the absence of any infirmity in the impugned order and applying the earlier precedent, the Tribunal found no basis to interfere with the quantum fixed by the adjudicating authority.

Conclusion: The redemption fine and penalty were upheld and no enhancement was warranted.

Ratio Decidendi: Where confiscation is sustainable for import without the required licence, the Tribunal will not enhance redemption fine or penalty if the adjudicating authority's quantum is found sufficient and consistent with the governing precedent.

---