Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the simultaneous issuance of a non-bailable warrant and process under Section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against a woman senior citizen accused in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was sustainable, and whether personal attendance could be dispensed with in appropriate proceedings.
Analysis: The order issuing a non-bailable warrant and process under Section 82 was tested against the settled principle that coercive process must be used with caution and only after proper scrutiny of facts and application of mind. In complaint cases, summons is the normal first resort, followed by bailable warrant and only thereafter, when intentional avoidance is apparent, non-bailable process may be issued. The Court also noticed that the applicant was a woman and a senior citizen, and referred to the discretion under Section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to dispense with personal attendance where justified. The challenge to the summoning order itself was not entertained, and the broader issue regarding the source of funds and the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was left to be considered in the trial.
Conclusion: The simultaneous issuance of the non-bailable warrant and process under Section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was held unsustainable and was quashed. The request to interfere with the summoning order was not accepted.
Ratio Decidendi: Coercive criminal process must be issued progressively and with due application of mind, and simultaneous issuance of a non-bailable warrant and Section 82 process without adequate justification is impermissible.