Appellant's Customs Act penalty upheld for shortlanding urea shipment. Failure to provide evidence led to Rs. 1,40,000 fine. The penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 116 of the Customs Act for shortlanding of urea was upheld by all authorities, including the High ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellant's Customs Act penalty upheld for shortlanding urea shipment. Failure to provide evidence led to Rs. 1,40,000 fine.
The penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 116 of the Customs Act for shortlanding of urea was upheld by all authorities, including the High Court. The appellant failed to provide evidence of the actual loading quantity and could have corrected the manifest if the quantity was incorrect. The writ appeal was rejected, affirming the penalty of Rs. 1,40,000.
The appellant imported urea but there was a shortlanding of 77,448 M.Ts. Penalty of Rs. 1,40,000 imposed under Section 116 of the Customs Act. No evidence to show actual loading quantity. Importer could have amended manifest if quantity was incorrect. Penalty upheld by all authorities. Writ appeal rejected.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.