Remand for want of finding on document-production compliance leaves limitation and insolvency merits open.

The Supreme Court considered whether an appellate order could stand where no finding was recorded on compliance with a direction to produce financial records relevant to acknowledgment of debt. Because the appellate court did not determine that material factual issue, the existing record was insufficient for final adjudication, and the parties' merits contentions were left open. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh disposal, with reconsideration to proceed on the existing and additional issues without any determination on limitation or the underlying insolvency dispute.

---

---

Issues: Whether the impugned appellate order was liable to be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh disposal because no finding was recorded on compliance with the direction for production of documents.

Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the direction requiring production of financial records had been complied with, since those documents were said to bear on the question of acknowledgment of debt. The appellate order did not record any finding of fact on this material aspect, although compliance was asserted by one side. In the absence of such a finding, the matter could not be finally adjudicated on the existing record, and the parties' contentions on merits were kept open.

Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was restored for fresh disposal, in favour of the appellant.

Final Conclusion: The matter was remitted for reconsideration on the existing and additional issues, without any determination on the merits of limitation or the underlying insolvency dispute.

---