Appeals partly allowed for depreciation, other grounds dismissed as debatable. CIT(A) to review independently.

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, directing the AO to grant depreciation but dismissing other grounds as debatable issues not suitable for rectification under Section 154. The CIT(A) was advised to independently consider the pending appeals without being influenced by the Tribunal's findings.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Denying exemption under Section 11 of the Income-tax Act.
2. Computation of tax under Section 115BBE.
3. Non-granting of depreciation.
4. Denial of exemption under Section 11 due to pending cancellation of registration.

Summary:

Issue 1: Denying exemption under Section 11 of the Act

The assessee contended that the exemption under Section 11 was denied without invoking provisions of Section 68, 69A, 69B, and 69D. The AO quantified undisclosed capitation fees and taxed it under Section 115BBE. The Tribunal held that the AO's action was correct and any mistake was debatable, suggesting that the assessee should seek remedy through appeal rather than rectification under Section 154. The appeals on this ground were dismissed.

Issue 2: Computation of Tax

The assessee argued that the tax computation was incorrect and filed an application under Section 154 for rectification. The AO had taxed part of the income under Section 115BBE and the balance at normal rates. The Tribunal found no error in tax computation and held that the issue was disputable, not a mistake apparent from the record. The appeals on this ground were dismissed.

Issue 3: Non-granting of Depreciation

The assessee claimed that once exemption under Section 11 was denied, depreciation should be allowed. The AO and CIT(A) had denied this claim as it was not made in the return of income. The Tribunal held that when income is assessed as business income, usual deductions, including depreciation, should be granted. The AO was directed to allow depreciation, and the appeals on this ground were allowed.

Issue 4: Denial of exemption under Section 11 due to pending cancellation of registration

The assessee argued that exemption under Section 11 should be allowed as the order canceling registration under Section 12AA(3) was set aside. The AO denied exemption due to pending cancellation proceedings and findings from a second search. The Tribunal noted that this issue was debatable and not suitable for rectification under Section 154. The appeals on this ground were dismissed, but the CIT(A) was instructed to take an independent view in the pending appeals.

Conclusion:

The appeals were partly allowed, with the Tribunal directing the AO to grant depreciation but dismissing other grounds as debatable issues not suitable for rectification under Section 154. The CIT(A) was advised to independently consider the pending appeals without being influenced by the Tribunal's findings.

---