Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2023 (8) TMI 31 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Broad reading of tax collection on mining-related receipts sustained for compounding fees, while contribution issues required factual verification. Section 206C(1C) was treated as extending to compounding fees collected from illegal mining and transportation of minerals, because the expression ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Broad reading of tax collection on mining-related receipts sustained for compounding fees, while contribution issues required factual verification.

                          Section 206C(1C) was treated as extending to compounding fees collected from illegal mining and transportation of minerals, because the expression "transfer" was read broadly to cover parting with an interest in a mine even without a formal lease or licence; the TCS demand on that component was sustained. By contrast, liability on contributions to the District Mineral Foundation and the National Mineral Exploration Trust depended on whether the assessee actually received those amounts or only acted as a conduit, since the statutory contribution obligations under Sections 9B and 9C of the MMDR Act lay on the lease holder; both matters required factual verification and were sent back.




                          Issues: (i) Whether tax collection at source was chargeable under Section 206C(1C) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on compounding fees received from illegal mining and transportation of minerals; (ii) whether the assessee was liable to collect tax at source on contributions towards the District Mineral Foundation; and (iii) whether the assessee was liable to collect tax at source on contributions towards the National Mineral Exploration Trust.

                          Issue (i): Whether tax collection at source was chargeable under Section 206C(1C) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on compounding fees received from illegal mining and transportation of minerals.

                          Analysis: The statutory trigger under Section 206C(1C) was treated as extending beyond formal lease or licence arrangements, because the words used in the provision also covered cases where rights or interests in a mine were transferred otherwise. The expression "transfer" was read broadly with reference to Section 2(47) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the collection of amounts equal to ten times royalty from illegal miners was treated as showing parting with an interest in the mine for the relevant use. The plea that no written lease, licence, or contract existed was rejected on this construction.

                          Conclusion: The assessee was liable to collect tax at source on the compounding fees, and the demand on this count was upheld.

                          Issue (ii): Whether the assessee was liable to collect tax at source on contributions towards the District Mineral Foundation.

                          Analysis: Section 9B of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 placed the obligation to pay the District Mineral Foundation contribution on the lease holder, and the record suggested that the assessee may not have been the recipient of those amounts. Since the charging obligation under Section 206C(1C) depended on debiting or receipt by the collector, the matter turned on the factual question whether the assessee actually received the contribution or whether the lease holders paid it directly to the Foundation. The accounts on record created an ambiguity that required verification.

                          Conclusion: The issue was remanded for factual verification, and no final liability was affirmed at this stage.

                          Issue (iii): Whether the assessee was liable to collect tax at source on contributions towards the National Mineral Exploration Trust.

                          Analysis: Section 9C of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 similarly placed the obligation to pay the National Mineral Exploration Trust contribution on the lease holder. The Tribunal again found that the decisive question was whether the assessee had actually received the amount or merely acted as a conduit while the lease holders paid the Trust directly. In view of the material in the accounts and the need to ascertain the real flow of funds, the matter required reconsideration by the Assessing Officer.

                          Conclusion: The issue was remanded for factual verification, and no final liability was affirmed at this stage.

                          Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only in part, with the liability on compounding fees sustained and the questions relating to District Mineral Foundation and National Mineral Exploration Trust contributions sent back for verification.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found