Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ court's order granting duty drawback under the Special Economic Zone regime called for interference in appeal, particularly on the findings that the unit was part of the same entity and that the payment mechanism amounted to substantial compliance with the applicable rules.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the characterization of Kariwala Green Bags as a division of the same enterprise and not a separate entity, the permissibility of intra-entity transfer of goods for manufacture, and whether the requirement under the Special Economic Zone Rules regarding procurement of domestic tariff area goods through a foreign currency account was satisfied in substance. The appellate court reiterated that interference with factual findings is confined to cases of jurisdictional error, breach of natural justice, apparent error of law, or findings that are perverse, grossly unreasonable, or unconscionable. Where the factual findings are plausible and supported by the record, the court will not reappreciate evidence or substitute its own view.
Conclusion: The findings in favour of the duty drawback claimant were held to be plausible and not perverse, and the order allowing the drawback claim was left undisturbed.