Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition should interfere with the Tribunal's refusal to grant stay and waiver of pre-deposit in a central excise appeal, and whether the petitioner should be permitted to raise the plea that the demand was barred by limitation before the Tribunal.
Analysis: The petition was not taken up for substantive adjudication of the excise demand. Instead, the Court found that the petitioner's grievance could be addressed by permitting a fresh stay and waiver application before the Tribunal, specifically raising the legal and factual plea of limitation, and by directing early consideration of the stay request and the appeal.
Outcome: The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to move a fresh stay or waiver application before the Tribunal and with a direction for expeditious consideration of the application and appeal.