Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether profit from offshore supplies made from Japan could be attributed to the assessee's permanent establishment in India and taxed in India when the offshore segment resulted in loss and the Indian project office's role was confined to customs-related compliance.
Analysis: The appeals concerned addition made by attributing 35% of the profit from offshore supplies to the assessee's Indian permanent establishment. The Tribunal noted that the equipment was manufactured and supplied from Japan, the transporter handled delivery to India, and the lower authorities had not identified any substantive role of the Indian project office in the offshore transaction beyond customs clearance. The Tribunal further relied on the jurisdictional High Court decision holding that, under Article 7 of the applicable DTAA, attribution arises only to the extent profits are attributable to the permanent establishment, and where the foreign enterprise has a global net loss, no profit can be attributed to the PE.
Conclusion: The addition on account of attribution of profit from offshore supplies was not sustainable and was directed to be deleted. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Under Article 7 of the DTAA, profits can be attributed to an Indian permanent establishment only to the extent the foreign enterprise earns taxable profits and the PE has a real role in the relevant transaction; where the offshore segment yields no profit or loss is shown, no attributable income can be brought to tax in India.