Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the nominal amount recovered by the employer from employees towards canteen food supplied in compliance with the Factories Act, 1948 is liable to GST.
Analysis: The canteen facility was held to give rise to two distinct transactions: supply by the third-party caterer to the employer, and supply by the employer to its employees. The amount recovered from employees was treated as consideration for the employer's supply of food and beverages, not as a mere reimbursement or pass-through. The canteen facility was not regarded as a contractual perquisite within the scope of the CBIC circular, and the mandate under the Factories Act, 1948 did not create any GST exemption. The supply of food or drink for consideration was held to fall within the statutory treatment of supply of service under Schedule II.
Conclusion: The recovery from employees was held to attract GST, and the appeal was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The ruling of the Advance Ruling Authority was affirmed, and the employer's challenge to GST on the employee recovery for canteen supplies failed.