We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic • Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced • Includes everything in Basic • Detailed report covering: - Overview Summary - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars] - Relevant Case Laws - Tariff / Classification / HSN - Expert views from TaxTMI - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Parental insurance recovery not taxable under GST laws; Input tax credit not eligible; Ruling subject to CGST Act provisions. The Advance Ruling Authority held that the recovery of parental insurance premiums from employees by the applicant does not amount to a 'Supply of ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Parental insurance recovery not taxable under GST laws; Input tax credit not eligible; Ruling subject to CGST Act provisions.
The Advance Ruling Authority held that the recovery of parental insurance premiums from employees by the applicant does not amount to a "Supply of Service" under GST laws. Therefore, the recovery of premiums for parental insurance is not considered a taxable supply, and GST paid on such amounts is not eligible for input tax credit. The ruling stands unless invalidated under the CGST Act provisions.
Issues: 1. Whether the amount recovered from employees towards parental insurance premium is deemed as a "Supply of Service" by the applicant. 2. If the first question is affirmative, whether the value of the supply would be NIL as a "Pure Agent" or what would be the value. 3. If GST is payable on the amount recovered, whether the GST paid by the applicant to the insurance company would be admissible as input tax credit.
Analysis: 1. The applicant, engaged in software development, provides mediclaim coverage to employees and their families. The issue is whether the recovery of parental insurance premium constitutes a "Supply of Service." The CGST Act defines "Supply" and "Service," emphasizing business-related activities. The applicant's main business is software development, not insurance services. Previous rulings support that such recoveries are not considered a supply of service.
2. The recovery of premium from employees for parental insurance, transferred to the insurance company, is not integral to the software development business. The Maharashtra AAR ruling and the applicant's case indicate that this activity does not qualify as a supply in the course of business. The recovery and deposit of premiums do not constitute a service provided by the applicant.
3. The Authority concurs with the applicant that facilitating insurance services for employees' parents is not ancillary to software development. The ruling states that the recovery of parental insurance premiums from employees does not amount to a "Supply of Service" under GST laws. Therefore, the recovery of premiums for parental insurance is not considered a taxable supply, and GST paid on such amounts is not eligible for input tax credit.
Conclusion: The Advance Ruling Authority determined that the recovery of parental insurance premiums from employees by the applicant does not constitute a "Supply of Service." The ruling is valid unless declared void under the CGST Act provisions.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.