Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether excise duty on blended wool tops was payable only at the stage of removal from the factory, or whether duty was chargeable at the stage of manufacture of the 100% wool tops when the goods were later blended within the same integrated factory.
Analysis: The charging event for excise is the manufacture or production of goods under Section 3 of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944. Rule 9 regulates the manner of collection and cannot alter the point at which the duty liability arises. On the facts, duty had already been discharged when the 100% wool tops came into existence. The later blending with synthetic fibre did not bring into existence a new commodity or a different article, and the classification remained unchanged. The question of any alleged breach of Rule 51A was outside the issue referred for decision.
Conclusion: No further excise duty was leviable on the blended wool tops at the stage of clearance. The impugned order was therefore unsustainable and the decision was in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded on the question of the proper stage of levy, and the Central Government's order was quashed.
Ratio Decidendi: Excise duty is attracted at the stage of manufacture or production, and where duty has already been paid on the manufactured intermediate product, no fresh levy can be imposed merely because that product is subsequently blended into another article that does not amount to a new manufacture.