Tribunal upholds income addition due to sales turnover mismatch. Assessee's appeal dismissed. Limited scrutiny, profit element, and hearing considered.

The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 19,74,561/- to the assessee's income due to a mismatch in sales turnover. The assessee's appeal was dismissed entirely, with the Tribunal finding no merit in the grounds raised regarding limited scrutiny, agreement to difference in receipts/sales, taxation of profit element, consideration of submissions by authorities, and adequacy of hearing opportunity. The order was pronounced on 11th May 2023.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Addition of Rs. 19,74,561/- due to mismatch in sales turnover.
2. Scope of limited scrutiny.
3. Agreement to difference in receipts/sales.
4. Taxation of profit element.
5. Consideration of submissions by AO and CIT(A).
6. Adequate opportunity of being heard by CIT(A).

Summary:

Issue 1: Addition of Rs. 19,74,561/- due to mismatch in sales turnover
The AO added Rs. 19,74,561/- to the assessee's income, citing a mismatch between the sales turnover reported in the Profit & Loss account and the actual receipts. The AO noted that the assessee followed a cash system of accounting but failed to reconcile the difference. The assessee argued that the difference was due to the inclusion of service tax in gross receipts, which was not reflected in the net sales reported. However, the Tribunal found no merit in this claim, as the assessee did not provide sufficient evidence to support the inclusion of service tax in the gross receipts. Consequently, the addition was upheld.

Issue 2: Scope of limited scrutiny
The assessee contended that the addition was beyond the scope of limited scrutiny. However, the Tribunal noted that the case was selected for scrutiny due to discrepancies in turnover reported in various documents, including the service tax return and ITR. The AO's addition was based on these discrepancies, which fell within the scope of limited scrutiny. Therefore, this ground was dismissed.

Issue 3: Agreement to difference in receipts/sales
The assessee argued that the agreed difference in receipts/sales during assessment and appellate proceedings should be ignored. The Tribunal dismissed this ground, stating that the assessee had not alleged any coercion, threat, or undue influence during the agreement.

Issue 4: Taxation of profit element
The assessee claimed that only the profit element of the difference should be taxed. The Tribunal dismissed this ground, noting that the expenditure related to the amount of Rs. 19,74,561/- had already been claimed in the Profit & Loss account. Therefore, the AO was justified in adding the entire amount.

Issue 5: Consideration of submissions by AO and CIT(A)
The assessee alleged that the AO and CIT(A) did not consider his submissions. The Tribunal found no merit in this claim, as both authorities had reproduced and considered the assessee's submissions before arriving at their decisions. This ground was dismissed.

Issue 6: Adequate opportunity of being heard by CIT(A)
The assessee contended that the CIT(A) disposed of the appeal without providing adequate opportunity for a hearing. The Tribunal dismissed this ground, observing that the CIT(A) had reproduced and considered the assessee's submissions in the order.

Conclusion:
The appeal of the assessee was dismissed in its entirety. The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 19,74,561/- and found no merit in the other grounds raised by the assessee. The order was pronounced in open court on 11th May 2023.

---