Strict construction of exemption notifications denied blended spun yarn exemption where it did not squarely match the exempted description.

Blended spun yarn composed of polypropylene and viscose was held not to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 332/77-C.E. even though it fell under Item 18E as non-cellulosic spun yarn. The Court applied strict construction of exemption notifications and held that the notification was confined to polypropylene spun yarn alone; predominant polypropylene content did not make a blended yarn eligible. The classification explanation on equality of fibres did not assist the assessee, and there was no proof of commercial parlance treating the product as polypropylene spun yarn. The ratio is that a product must squarely satisfy the exempted description before exemption can be claimed.

---

---

Issues: Whether blended spun yarn containing 52% polypropylene fibre and 48% viscose fibre was covered by Notification No. 332/77-C.E. granting exemption to polypropylene spun yarn falling under Item 18E of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.

Analysis: The goods admittedly fell under Item 18E as non-cellulosic spun yarn because polypropylene predominated in weight. The exemption notification, however, was confined to polypropylene spun yarn and did not extend to blended yarn merely because polypropylene was the predominant constituent. The classification explanation dealing with equality of fibres did not assist the assessee, and there was no proof that the blended yarn was known in commercial parlance as polypropylene spun yarn. As an exemption provision, the notification had to be strictly construed, and the assessee had to bring the goods squarely within its terms.

Conclusion: The blended yarn was not entitled to exemption under Notification No. 332/77-C.E.; the decision was against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification must be strictly construed, and a product falling within a tariff item does not automatically qualify for exemption unless it squarely answers the exempted description.

---