Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to a writ directing the customs authorities to give effect to the order dropping the show-cause proceedings and to make the necessary endorsement in the DEEC Book, and whether further directions for bank guarantee or time-bound disposal of the departmental appeal were required.
Analysis: The petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking implementation of the Collector of Customs' order dropping the proceedings initiated by the show-cause notice. The Court noted that the departmental stay application before the Tribunal had already been dismissed and considered it appropriate to protect the revenue by requiring the petitioner to execute a legal undertaking under the Handbook of Procedure while directing the endorsement to be made. The Court declined to insist on a bank guarantee and also declined to issue any direction to the Tribunal for disposal of the appeal within a fixed period.
Conclusion: The petitioner was held entitled to the requested writ relief in terms of the order, with the endorsement to be made on execution of the legal undertaking, and the additional prayers were rejected.