Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order, demand notice and penalty notices were liable to be set aside on the ground that notices under Section 142(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were sent to an email address not registered by the assessee, resulting in denial of an effective opportunity to reply.
Analysis: The notices were not issued to the email IDs furnished by the assessee on the departmental portal. As the impugned assessment proceeded on the basis of non-response to those notices, the failure to serve notice on the registered email address deprived the assessee of a proper opportunity to respond. This defect went to the root of the assessment process and justified interference.
Conclusion: The assessment order, computation sheet, demand notice and penalty notices were set aside, and the matter was remitted to the revenue authorities to proceed from the stage of reply to the Section 142(1) notice.
Ratio Decidendi: Where statutory notices are not served on the email address registered by the assessee, resulting in denial of an opportunity to respond, the consequential assessment and allied notices are liable to be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration from the stage of notice reply.