Notice Under Section 148 Set Aside for Targeting Non-Existent Entity in Income Tax Case The court set aside the notice and order issued under Section 148 and 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2016-17, as they were directed ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Notice Under Section 148 Set Aside for Targeting Non-Existent Entity in Income Tax Case
The court set aside the notice and order issued under Section 148 and 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2016-17, as they were directed at a non-existent entity, the former partnership firm. The petitioner, filing taxes as a proprietor, demonstrated no concealment of purchases, and the court acknowledged that the notice could not be enforced against a non-entity. The respondents were permitted to take further lawful actions. The writ petition was allowed, and the pending application was closed.
Issues involved: The issues involved in the judgment are the quashing of a notice passed under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act and an order under Section 148A(d) of the Act pertaining to the Assessment Year 2016-17.
Summary of the Judgment:
Issue 1: Notice and Order Validity The petitioner approached the court seeking to quash a notice and order under the Income Tax Act. The petitioner argued that the notice and order were not sustainable as they were issued in the name of a non-existent entity, the erstwhile partnership firm. The petitioner contended that the mention of the partnership firm's PAN in the bill of entry was a genuine mistake and that the purchases were not concealed in the books of the proprietorship concern. The revenue's counsel acknowledged that an order and notice against a non-entity cannot be enforced.
Issue 2: Compliance and Supporting Documents During the hearing, the petitioner clarified that income tax returns were being filed in his capacity as the proprietor of the business. The court directed the petitioner to provide relevant income tax returns, balance sheets, profit & loss accounts, and purchase orders and invoices related to imports. The petitioner submitted additional affidavits along with supporting documents, including invoices from Chinese exporters and income tax returns filed under his PAN. The court noted that there was no deliberate concealment of facts and that the imports were properly declared in the books of accounts.
Issue 3: Judgment and Conclusion The court found that the notice and order were issued against a non-existent entity and therefore could not be complied with. Consequently, the court set aside the order and notice dated 31.03.2023. The respondents were granted the liberty to take further steps in accordance with the law. As a result, the writ petition was allowed, and the pending application was closed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
