Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
High Court emphasizes diligence in filing appeals, rejects revenue department's delayed appeal. Law applies equally to Govt. The High Court of Calcutta declined to condone a delay of 1223 days in filing an appeal by the revenue department, emphasizing the importance of diligence ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
High Court emphasizes diligence in filing appeals, rejects revenue department's delayed appeal. Law applies equally to Govt.
The High Court of Calcutta declined to condone a delay of 1223 days in filing an appeal by the revenue department, emphasizing the importance of diligence in exercising legal rights. The Court highlighted that the law of limitation applies equally to the Government as to any other litigant, denying special leniency to the Government. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for condonation of delay and rejected the appeal filed by the revenue. Additionally, the application for stay was closed following the dismissal of the appeal.
Issues: Delay in filing appeal, Condonation of delay, Law of limitation, Government as a litigant
The High Court of Calcutta, comprising Justice T.S. Sivagnanam and Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, heard the case involving a delay of 1223 days in filing an appeal by the appellant/revenue. The order under challenge was passed by the Tribunal on November 16, 2018, with the certified copy received on December 20, 2018, and the appeal presented to the Court on August 24, 2022. The Court noted that the delay from November 20, 2018, had not been adequately explained, with the reasons provided being self-serving and lacking substance. The Court highlighted that the decision to appeal was made by the department well after a previous court decision, emphasizing the importance of diligence in exercising one's legal rights. The judgment stressed that the law of limitation applies equally to the Government as to any other litigant, with no special leniency granted to the Government due to its status as a significant litigant. Consequently, the Court declined to condone the delay, dismissing the application for condonation of delay (IA No.GA/1/2022) and rejecting the appeal filed by the revenue (ITAT/189/2022). Additionally, the application for stay (IA No.GA/2/2022) was also closed in light of the dismissal of the appeal.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
of 
TaxTMI 
