Tribunal rules in favor of appellant on service tax demands and Cenvat Credit issues

The Tribunal set aside the demands for service tax under 'Technical Testing and Analysis Services' and 'Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Services,' ruling in favor of the appellant as the services were considered exported. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the demand for reversal of Cenvat Credit for exempted services due to procedural lapses and allowed the appellant's claim for Cenvat Credit on meal passes and group insurance services. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Demand of Service Tax under 'Technical Testing and Analysis Services' (TTAS) and 'Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Services' (MRASS).
2. Reversal of Cenvat Credit attributable to exempted services.
3. Disallowance of Cenvat Credit on meal passes and group insurance services.

Summary:

1. Demand of Service Tax under TTAS and MRASS:

The appellant contested the demand of Rs. 64,14,748/- under TTAS and MRASS, arguing that these services were exported and thus not subject to service tax. The appellant provided these services to their parent company in the USA and received payment in convertible foreign exchange. The Tribunal referred to various precedents and regulations under FEMA, confirming that payment received in Indian rupees from a bank account situated outside India qualifies as receipt in convertible foreign exchange. The Tribunal concluded that the services were indeed exported, and thus, the demand of Rs. 64,14,748/- for service tax was set aside.

2. Reversal of Cenvat Credit for Exempted Services:

The appellant had reversed the proportionate credit attributable to exempted services but had not intimated the department. The department demanded 6%/8% of the value of exempted services due to this procedural lapse. The Tribunal, referencing previous decisions, held that the substantive right to reverse proportionate credit cannot be denied due to procedural lapses. It was determined that the demand for reversal of credit as per Rule 6(3) of CCR 2004 was not sustainable and was set aside.

3. Disallowance of Cenvat Credit on Meal Passes and Group Insurance Services:

The appellant claimed Cenvat credit on meal passes and group insurance services, which the department disallowed. The Tribunal noted that during the relevant period, the definition of "input services" included activities related to business, thus covering these services if used for providing output services. The Tribunal found no evidence that these services were not used for the employees of the appellant-company and held that the credit was eligible. Consequently, the disallowance of credit was set aside.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal set aside the demands confirmed in the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief.

---