Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for reopening assessment is valid when issued in the name of a deceased assessee, and whether such proceedings can be sustained in the absence of participation by the legal heir.
Analysis: The fact of death of the assessee was not in dispute, and the legal heir had informed the income-tax authority of the death. A notice issued to a dead person is a jurisdictional defect and renders the reassessment proceedings a nullity. Section 292B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 does not cure such a defect. The proceedings could be sustained only if the legal representative had submitted to the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer or participated in the proceedings, which was not shown here.
Conclusion: The notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was invalid and could not be sustained; the reassessment proceedings were liable to be set aside.
Final Conclusion: The impugned reopening notice was quashed and the revenue was restrained from proceeding against the deceased assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A notice issued to a deceased person for reassessment is void ab initio and cannot be validated by section 292B unless the legal representative has participated in the proceedings or otherwise submitted to jurisdiction.