Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether capital gains arising from the joint development agreement were assessable in assessment year 2011-12 on the footing that transfer had occurred on the date of the agreement under section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
Analysis: The transfer provision in section 2(47)(v) applies only where possession of immovable property is allowed to be taken or retained in part performance of a contract of the nature referred to in section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. For section 53A to operate, the transferee must have taken possession in part performance and must also have performed or be willing to perform his part of the contract. The joint development agreement in question expressly stated that the permission granted to the developer was not to be construed as delivery of possession under section 53A and that the owner would continue in possession until the contract was discharged by performance. The facts also showed that conversion of the agricultural land into non-agricultural land occurred only on 03.12.2012 and possession was handed over thereafter.
Conclusion: Section 2(47)(v) was not attracted in assessment year 2011-12 and the capital gains could not be taxed in that year.
Ratio Decidendi: A joint development agreement does not amount to transfer under section 2(47)(v) unless possession is actually given in part performance of a contract satisfying section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, together with the transferee's performance or willingness to perform the contract.