Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether capital gains arising from the joint development agreement were chargeable in the assessment year 2010-11 by treating the agreement as a transfer under section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The joint development agreement expressly described the possession granted to the developer as permissive possession and stated that it was not given in part performance or as delivery of possession under section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The determining requirement for section 2(47)(v) is that the transaction must fall within the nature of part performance under section 53A, including a written contract, transfer for consideration, possession in part performance, and the transferee's readiness and willingness to perform. The record showed that the developer had not performed the contractual obligations in the relevant year, no meaningful development had taken place, the necessary approvals had not been obtained, and the assessee had received only a refundable deposit. The authority relied on the principle that a development agreement does not by itself create a transfer unless the statutory ingredients of section 53A are satisfied.
Conclusion: Section 2(47)(v) could not be invoked to tax capital gains in assessment year 2010-11 on the facts of this case, and the addition was not sustainable for that year.
Ratio Decidendi: A joint development agreement results in a deemed transfer under section 2(47)(v) only when it satisfies the statutory ingredients of section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, including the transferee's readiness and willingness to perform and possession in part performance; absent those conditions, capital gains cannot be taxed in the year of the agreement.