Aluminous cement classification for refractory use supports exemption despite high alumina content and disputed sub-heading

Imported aluminous cement used to manufacture refractory bricks was treated as classifiable under CTH 25233000 and eligible for exemption under Notifications No. 21/2002-Cus and No. 12/2012-Cus. The analysis followed earlier Tribunal reasoning that high alumina content does not, by itself, take the goods outside aluminous cement where the tariff and exemption scheme cover Chapter 25 goods used for refractory products. It also clarifies that a disputed tariff description alone does not establish misdeclaration. The stated effect is that exemption is not denied merely because the department suggests a different sub-heading.

---

---

Issues: Whether aluminous cement imported for manufacture of refractory bricks was correctly classifiable under CTH 25233000 and entitled to exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus dated 01.03.2002 and Notification No. 12/2012-Cus dated 17.03.2012.

Analysis: The imported goods were declared as aluminous cement and the documents filed with the Bills of Entry showed the alumina content. The dispute turned on whether the higher alumina content required classification as high alumina refractory cement under a different heading. The Tribunal noted that the earlier decision in Vesuvius India Ltd. had already examined the same tariff structure and the same exemption scheme, and had held that the presence of high alumina content did not take the goods outside aluminous cement for the purpose of the exemption, so long as they were used for manufacture of refractory products and fell within Chapter 25. It also held that mere wrong classification did not, by itself, establish misdeclaration.

Conclusion: The goods were held to be correctly classifiable under CTH 25233000 and the respondent was held entitled to the benefit of the exemption notifications.

Final Conclusion: The revenue challenge failed, the impugned order was sustained, and the exemption claim of the importer was upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: Where imported aluminous cement is used for manufacture of refractory products and the exemption notification is framed by reference to aluminous cement falling within Chapter 25 without restricting it to a particular sub-heading, the benefit cannot be denied merely because the material contains a high percentage of alumina or because a different tariff sub-heading is suggested by the department.

---