Court Overturns Previous Orders, Directs Tax Authority to Reassess Refund Application and Consider Delay Reasons.

The HC set aside the impugned orders dated 29.08.2019 and 25.02.2021, allowing the writ petition. The Court emphasized that the assessing authority must consider grounds for delay before rejecting a refund application. The matter was remanded to the Superintendent of Taxes to reconsider the refund application, taking into account the grounds for condonation of delay.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Entitlement to refund.
2. Timeliness and procedural compliance of the refund application.
3. Consideration of grounds for condonation of delay.

Summary:

Entitlement to Refund:
The petitioner, a registered dealer under the Assam VAT Act, 2003, claimed a refund of Rs. 75,59,265 for the assessment year 2012-13. The assessing officer determined this amount as refundable after adjusting input tax credit and TDS against the output tax liability. Despite submitting a refund application, the petitioner did not receive the refund, leading to the filing of another application on 18.07.2019.

Timeliness and Procedural Compliance:
The Superintendent of Taxes rejected the refund application on 29.08.2019, citing Section 50 of the Assam VAT Act, 2003, and Rule 29 of the Assam VAT Rules, 2005, which mandate that refund applications must be made within 180 days from the date of assessment. The petitioner's application was deemed time-barred. The Additional Commissioner of Taxes upheld this decision on 25.02.2021, stating there was no substantive evidence justifying the delay.

Consideration of Grounds for Condonation of Delay:
The petitioner argued that the delay in filing the refund application was due to circumstances beyond their control and requested condonation of the delay. The Court noted that the Superintendent of Taxes did not consider the grounds for delay in their order, while the revisional authority did, but found them insufficient. The Court emphasized that the assessing authority is vested with the power to consider such grounds and must do so before rejecting a refund application.

Judgment:
The Court referenced previous judgments, including a Division Bench ruling and an Apex Court decision, which held that refunds due to the assessee cannot be denied on the ground of limitation if sufficient cause is shown. The Court concluded that the assessing authority must consider the grounds for delay and render a decision accordingly. The matter was remanded back to the Superintendent of Taxes to re-decide the refund application, considering the grounds for condonation of delay. The impugned orders dated 29.08.2019 and 25.02.2021 were set aside, and the writ petition was allowed.

---