Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a return treated as an invalid return under section 139(9) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could thereafter be processed under section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Section 139(9) provides that where the defect is not rectified within the permitted time, the return is to be treated as an invalid return and the law applies as if the assessee had failed to furnish the return. Section 143(1) contemplates processing only of a return made under section 139 or in response to notice under section 142(1). The Central Processing of Returns Scheme, 2011, particularly Rules 6 and 8, also distinguishes between invalid or defective returns and valid returns, and permits processing of an invalid return only on the basis of information available, not as a valid return for regular adjustment of claims.
Conclusion: Once the return was treated as invalid under section 139(9), it could not be processed as a valid return under section 143(1); the intimation issued on that basis was held unsustainable, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A return treated as invalid under section 139(9) is to be regarded as non-existent for the purpose of processing under section 143(1), which applies only to a valid return furnished under section 139 or in response to section 142(1).