Advance ruling application rejected for 'no locus standi'; writ refused, appeal allowed u/s100 with 30-day window An applicant challenged rejection of its advance ruling application on the ground of lack of locus standi. The HC held that the rejection constituted an ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Advance ruling application rejected for 'no locus standi'; writ refused, appeal allowed u/s100 with 30-day window
An applicant challenged rejection of its advance ruling application on the ground of lack of locus standi. The HC held that the rejection constituted an appealable order under s.100 of the WBGST Act, 2017, and that the statutory appellate remedy before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling was efficacious. Consequently, the HC declined to entertain the writ petition and granted liberty to file a statutory appeal within 30 days, directing that if filed within that period, it be decided on merits without objection on limitation.
The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order of the West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling on grounds of locus standi. The petitioner was granted liberty to file an appeal before the appellate authority within 30 days. Case citation: 2023 (5) TMI 231 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.