Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the net royalty payment, after adjusting royalty received, was to be apportioned among the assessee's manufacturing units on a pro rata basis or confined only to the Jammu unit for computing deduction under Section 80IB.
Analysis: The assessee's agreement permitted commercial exploitation of the technology at its Jammu plant and other locations, but the evidentiary record, including excise materials and machinery details, showed that the technology was not in fact exploited at any of the manufacturing units. The allowability of royalty itself was not in dispute before the Tribunal; the dispute was only as to the unit-wise allocation of the net royalty cost for the purpose of deduction under Section 80IB. On the facts, the royalty expenditure, net of licence fee received, was treated as a corporate expense requiring allocation on the same basis as other common expenses.
Conclusion: The net royalty payment was held to be apportionable among the manufacturing units on a pro rata basis, and not confined to the Jammu unit.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the issue remanded by the High Court, and the Revenue's challenge to the unit-wise allocation failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where royalty expenditure is a common business cost and the technology is not shown to have been actually exploited by a particular eligible unit, the net royalty cost must be allocated across the manufacturing units on a reasonable pro rata basis for computing deduction under Section 80IB.