Tribunal overturns Order on transportation services, not manpower supply.

The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the Order-in-Original by the Commissioner of Central Excise. The appellants' transportation services for tractors were not classified as 'Manpower Supply Agency Service.' The contract terms and job-specific arrangements indicated transportation services rather than manpower supply. The Tribunal considered previous judgments and the Circular clarifying service tax liability, ultimately deciding in favor of the appellants on 18.04.2023.

---

---

Issues involved:
The appeal is against the Order-in-Original passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh-I, concerning the classification of services provided by the appellants as 'Manpower Supply Agency Service.'

Comprehensive Details:

Issue 1:
The appellants were engaged in transporting tractors from the factory to dealers, with drivers appointed by them, paid on a per kilometer basis. The department alleged the service fell under 'Manpower Supply Agency Service.'

- The appellants argued that the service was for transportation, not manpower supply, as clarified by the board.
- Various case laws were cited to support the argument.
- The department cited a Circular stating cases like this are covered by 'Manpower Supply Agency Service.'

Issue 2:
The contract terms indicated the appellants were responsible for all aspects of transporting the tractors, including ensuring delivery in good condition, handling accidents, and compliance with statutory formalities.

- The terms did not indicate a supply of drivers but rather transportation services.
- The Circular clarified that even if wages are paid by the agency, the liability for service tax remains with the agency, not the clients.
- Previous tribunal judgments supported the view that job-specific arrangements do not constitute manpower supply.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal concluded that the appellants' work did not fall under 'Manpower Supply Agency Service,' setting aside the demand and associated penalties and interest.

[Order pronounced in the court on 18.04.2023]

---